Godfrey Baldacchino PhD BA PGCE MA is Professor of Sociology at the University of Malta and Malta Ambassador-at-Large for Islands and Small States. He is the founding editor of Island Studies Journal and editor of Small States and Territories journal. He served as President of the International Small Islands Studies Association (2014-2022) and as a Canada Research Chair (Island Studies) at the University of Prince Edward Island, Canada (2003-2013). He is also a member of the Advisory Board of the Okinawa Journal of Island Studies.
Island Ports: Insights into the ‘Betweenness’ of Island Spaces
Because of their self-evident geographies, (small) islands are often reduced to caricatures of isolation and insularity; this approach has been savagely criticized by an alternative and just as essentialized representation of islands as spaces of flows and connectivity. But such binarisms don’t explain anything. The actual personality and character of islands as liminal spaces, at once local and global, at once national and cosmopolitan, depends on the dynamics of their port (and often capital) cities. It is by looking at what happens in the spaces of potential cultural exchange and brokerage in such locales – including working waterfronts, coastal tourism establishments, religious rituals and celebrations – that one gets a better sense of whether and how islands, in spite (or because) of their smallness, can be ripe for human conviviality, multilingualism, tolerance and a peace based on prosperity. In contrast, it is when island societies develop a narrow, exceptionalist and special definition of themselves – including pillarised notions of their, internal own island communities in terms of race, ethnicity – that they reduce their appeal as ‘welcoming societies’ and instead become the strategic bulwarks, flanks and edges of hard borders.
Akihiro Iwashita is Professor of Slavic-Eurasian Research Center, Hokkaido University, Japan. He is a key border studies researcher of Asia and Eurasia, with expertise on the Sino-Russian borderlands as well as various disputes involving Japan. He has been an advocate of sharing contested territories, either through division or the joint management of disputes, including for the Northern Territories/Southern Kurils dispute between Japan and Russia. He has written extensively on cross-border politics and international relations, including books on New Geopolitics and the Rediscovery of the U.S.-Japan Alliance (Brookings Institution, 2010), Japan’s Border Issues: Pitfalls and Prospects (Routledge, 2016) and Geo-politics in Northeast Asia (Routledge, 2022). In addition to his research activities, he established the Japan International Border Studies Network, organized the Border Regions in Transition Conference (held in Fukuoka and Pusan), and served as President of the Association for Borderlands Studies (2015-2016). In 2019, he received IBRU’s Milefsky Award for his contributions to border studies.
The Changing World after Russia’s Invasion in Ukraine: As seen in Border Studies & Geo-Politics
The world has been shaken by Russia’s unexpected invasion of Ukraine in February, 2022. The war continues and potentially signals the end of the “post-Cold War” international order. If a coming era of great power competition will be referred to as a second “Cold War,” then we might consider the thirty years (1991-2022) that followed the Cold War as an “interglacial period,” like the “interwar period” between the First and Second World Wars. Since then, Russia officially broke with the international order and its norms, a series of international expectations that Russia herself had been instrumental in creating in the years since WWII. China, India and other powers have accepted Russia’s behavior, resulting in a new fault line emerging in the world.
The “interglacial period” consisted of three stages: a “borderless” world of open regionalism (1991-2002), a period characterized by cooperation with rivalries (2003-2014), and the widening of various fault lines within the international system (2014-2022). A key turning point was G.W. Bush’s unilateral invasion of Iraq, which caused many doubts regarding the possibility of a world based on international law, and paralyzed the “great coalition” which had emerged among the powers against “terrorism.” Since 2003, a rivalry between the Eurasian great powers—including Russia, China and India—and the US and wider West has developed. The independence of Kosovo and the Russo-Georgian war in 2008 added fuel to this conflict, though their cooperative frameworks still worked for global values and interests. In 2014, the Russian annexation of Crimea and invasion of Eastern Ukraine marked an escalation of this fracturing, although Putin declared “people’s self-determination” as offering an internationally-recognizable legal norm.
What does the end of this “interglacial period” mean for Europe, Asia and other regions? The paper analyzes the emerging world order from the viewpoints of border studies and geo-politics to reconsider the transformation of the past three decades.
Hiroko Matsuda is Professor at the Faculty of Contemporary Social Studies of Kobe Gakuin University, Japan. She received her doctoral degree in History from the Australian National University. She has published numerous journal articles and book chapters both in English and Japanese, including “Crossing the Water Border: Migrations and the Japanese Imperial Seaway between Taiwan and the Yaeyama Islands,” in Borders in East and West: Transnational and Comparative Perspectives, edited by Berger, Stefan and Hashimoto, Nobuya (Berghahn Books, 2022). She is the author of Liminality of the Japanese Empire: Border Crossings from Okinawa to Colonial Taiwan (University of Hawai‘i Press, 2019) and the co-editor of Rethinking Postwar Okinawa: Beyond American Occupation (Lexington Books, 2017)
Lecture title: The Ryukyu Islands in East Asian Relations
The Ryukyu Archipelago, which is commonly called “Okinawa”, not only played host to past U.S.–Japan
Geographical maps reveal that the Ryukyu Archipelago, consisting of 55 inhabited islands and extending approximately 1,100 kilometers southwest from Kyushu Island to northeastern Taiwan, defines the boundary between the East China Sea and the Philippine Sea. Before coming under the influence of the Japanese Shimazu-clan in the early 17th century, the Ryukyu Kingdom flourished as a hub for transit trade in Asia. In 1879, the Kingdom was forcefully annexed to Japan and officially became one of the Japanese administrative unit, Okinawa prefecture. Then, since after the cession of Taiwan after the Sino-Japanese War, Okinawa formed distinct connections with neighboring regions in the context of Japanese imperial expansion. Furthermore, under U.S. occupation following World War II, Okinawa also developed unique relationships with Taiwan and the Philippines. In this lecture, by paying particular attention to the diversity within the Archipelago, I reinterpret Okinawa’s modern history in the context of East Asian relations.
Alison Mountz is Professor of Geography and Canada Research Chair in Global Migration at the Balsillie School of International Affairs, Wilfrid Laurier University, Canada. She is cross-appointed between the School of International Policy and Governance and the Department of Geography and Environmental Studies at Wilfrid Laurier University, where she directs Laurier’s International Migration Research Centre and edits the journal Politics & Space (Environment & Planning C). Before moving to Laurier, Mountz was a faculty member of Syracuse University’s Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs for eight years. She also spent two years at Harvard University’s Canada Program, most recently as the 2015-2016 Mackenzie King Visiting Professor of Canadian Studies.
Mountz’s research explores how people cross borders, access asylum, survive detention, resist war, and create safe havens. She studies the tension between the decisions, displacements, and desires that drive human migration and the policies and practices designed to govern migration. Her recent research examines border enforcement, asylum, and detention on islands. Her work has been funded by the John D. and Catherine T. McArthur Foundation, the Canadian Embassy, the US National Science Foundation, Canada’s Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, and the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.
Philip Steinberg is UArctic Chair in Political Geography at Durham University (UK), where he directs the Durham Arctic Research Centre for Training and Interdisciplinary Collaboration (DurhamARCTIC) and IBRU: Durham University’s Centre for Borders Research. He has published widely on oceans and islands and, more broadly, on the political construction of territory beyond the limits of land. He has authored or edited seven books including The Social Construction of the Ocean (Cambridge, 2001), Contesting the Arctic: Politics and Imaginaries in the Circumpolar North (Bloomsbury, 2015), Territory Beyond Terra (Rowman and Littlefield, 2018), and, most recently The Routledge Handbook of Ocean Space (Routledge, 2022).
The disappearing island: Land, liquid, and the liminal in the ocean environment
“What is an island?” may be among the oldest (and, one might argue, more banal) questions posed by geographers. Usually asked with reference to size, permanence, inhabitability, or proximity to land, this paper approaches the question from a different perspective: that of materiality. If an island is, in its solid, landed form, the ‘opposite’ or ‘antithesis’ of the liquid sea that surrounds it, then how are we to place materialities that are neither liquid nor land: mangroves, sargasso, plastic garbage patches, or ice? In this paper, this question is addressed through a deep reading of the technomaterial, military, legal, and locational history of one particular ‘ice island’: T-3, a slab of glacial ice in the Arctic Ocean that had calved off of Canada’s Ellesmere Island, probably in the 1930s or 1940s, and was subsequently occupied for twenty-five years by the US military until it dissipated into the Atlantic Ocean. Through this engagement with a disappearing island that was not exactly land but also not exactly (sea-)water, questions are raised not just about ‘islandness’ but also about the nature of space, matter, socio-natural entanglements, and connections and divisions between human and more-than-human communities in a time of unprecedented environmental and geophysical change.
Moritake Tomikawa is Okinawa International University Professor Emeritus and served as President of Okinawa International University (2008-2012) and Vice Governor of Okinawa Prefecture (2017-2021). He obtained B.A. from University of the Ryukyus in 1971 and M.A. and Ph.D. from Meiji University in 1974 and 2001, respectively. As an expert in Island Economy, Okinawa Studies, and Taiwan Studies, his extensive works include Okinawa Development and Soft Power (Okinawa Times Publisher, 2009), Asian Dynamism and Okinawa Development (Ryukyu Shimpo Publisher, 2018), and many other publications in these fields. As Vice Governor of Okinawa Prefecture, he was deeply involved in formulating the ”New 21 Century Okinawa Promotion Plan (2023-2033),” which is a guiding principle of Okinawa’s development.
Changes and Future Prospects of OKINAWA Economy: Development Strategy of Island Economy
Okinawa has been at the mercy of historical fate, and the island society has been influenced by external factors such as foreign dominating power. After 27 years of U.S. Military administration, Okinawa reverted to Japan in 1972. U.S. Military has regulated society and economy in Okinawa. Depending on the Military economy has hindered the development of Okinawa because military bases are not an economic sector such as a firm and household based on market mechanisms. So it did not work as an economic activity nor brought macro-economic growth and multiplication.
However, a paradigm shift in Okinawa’s economy happened through socio-environment changes. While Japan has faced economic difficulty due to depopulation, Okinawa has experienced population growth and expanded its potential as “the Bridgehead of Asia” and has become “one of the Frontiers of Japan.” Now, Okinawa is expected to contribute to a recovery of Japan’s economy by the realization of Okinawa’s potential. We should not overlook that just before COVID-19, Okinawa outperformed the whole of Japan according to economic data such as the Bank-of-Japan Tankan survey, GDP growth ratio, and unemployment ratio. These economic phenomena have never been seen before.
Although the island economy has disadvantages in terms of natural and human resources, the island’s economic engine started because Okinawa’s comparative advantage as the Bridgehead of Asia and Okinawa’s Soft Power came up to the surface. The new Okinawa Promotion Plan considers the post-COVID-19 situation. Its goals aim at “the island where people can feel safe, secure and happy.” Also, it plans to develop Blue Economy by taking advantage of the vast sea area surrounding Okinawa. Okinawa has such diversity and flexibility that it can adapt to and accommodate the change of era.